Understanding sustainability, the Hawking style
Julio F. Campos
After my last post, I received a most interesting reader comment about why everything about sustainability is so complicated and formal.
As an example, the reader presented the example do Stephen Hawking, (hence the post title), to which I could add an enormous list of other scientists that are able to translate their most complicated researches into easy to understand way for the scientific illiterate community.
However, the problem is that being a multidisciplinary field, sustainability demands the explanation of a series of concepts from a large number of scientific fields. Which is time-consuming when considered the vast range of knowledge levels of the audience.
It's not impossible though. Paradoxically sustainability, or better, what to do to be sustainable can actually be put through only two sentences.
Here they are:
To explain sustainability to corporations:
"There is no such thing as sustainable growth"
"Stop buying what you don't really, really, need"
So, as one can see, with basically those two thumbs up rules that we must implement and we will go over halfway through a sustainable way of life.
"Easier to say than do"
There you have it. How to be sustainable is pretty easy to explain, how to make it happen is the real deal.
Many are trying. Maybe a lost battle when we see that one of the newest goals (SDG 8) cherished by the corporations is:
"Promote inclusive and SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, employment and decent work for all"
"Behind the office closed doors, the corporate sustainability speech is different"
But be honest, how many corporations are willing to really do that?
The one that you work for?
How many sustainability "teachers" of are explaining this?
Are you?
Was this article interesting to you?
If you like it, help us sharing the post. Thank you
Please, share your experience with us bellow.
Comments
Post a Comment